Legal Opinion

Balducci v. Strough

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.

Plaintiff, a taxpayer of the village of Canastota, brings this action to restrain further proceedings by the village officials under a proposition adopted by the trustees of the village and ratified by the electors providing fór a bond issue .of $150,000, of which $137,800, or so much thereof as might be necessary, should be issued for the purpose of securing for the village a new water supply. The resolution was ratified at a special election held April 23, 1929. Plaintiff insists that the resolution does not comply with the requirements of section 6 of the General Municipal Law (as amd. by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hearst v. McClellanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. New York & Rosendale Cement Co. v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Village of Bronxville v. SeymourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Lyon v. City of BinghamtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  5. Lawson v. . LincolnNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sykes v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Alexander v. RandallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  3. Stringham v. Union County People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API