Balducci v. Strough
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.
Plaintiff, a taxpayer of the village of Canastota, brings this action to restrain further proceedings by the village officials under a proposition adopted by the trustees of the village and ratified by the electors providing fór a bond issue .of $150,000, of which $137,800, or so much thereof as might be necessary, should be issued for the purpose of securing for the village a new water supply. The resolution was ratified at a special election held April 23, 1929. Plaintiff insists that the resolution does not comply with the requirements of section 6 of the General Municipal Law (as amd. by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hearst v. McClellanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- New York & Rosendale Cement Co. v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Village of Bronxville v. SeymourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Lyon v. City of BinghamtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Lawson v. . LincolnNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sykes v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Alexander v. RandallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Stringham v. Union County People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1948