Legal Opinion

Beauchamp v. Jordan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This litigation originated in the filing of an action at law by plaintiff, Laura Beauchamp, to recover damages from defendants, Harvey H. Jordan and Nora M. Jordan, his wife, sometimes referred to as Norma M. Jordan, for the alleged conversion of 37 head of cattle. The amended complaint contained three separate causes of action, the first cause being for the conversion of 34 head of cattle, the second cause for the conversion of two head of cattle, and the third cause for the conversion of a Jersey bull.

The only answer filed by defendant Nora M. Jordan was a general denial to the amended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Watson v. Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Barringer v. LoderOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bank of Gresham v. WalchOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. United States Nat. Bank v. HoltonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Cady v. Bay City Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Niday v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Medak v. DePrezOregon Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API