Legal Opinion

Fry v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 23, 1925No. 4638PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs in error, hereafter called defendants, were convicted of conspiracy to violate'the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138% et seq.); the purpose of the combination being to possess and sell intoxicating liquor, and to conduct and maintain common nuisances at certain places known as the Post Hotel, on Yésler Way, and the Seneca Hotel, at 1203% First avenue, Seattle. Overt acts charged were that Fry and Brown at various times possessed and sold intoxicating liquo-r at the two places above named. Brown and Fry brought writ of error. •

• The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Giles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
  4. Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. SklaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
  2. Frey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. TodiscoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Jacobs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API