Legal Opinion

Taylor v. McKay

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1975No. Civ. 36594PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CALDECOTT, P. J.

Respondents Pearlie Taylor, Rosario Schuler and Rosie Stephens 1 filed a petition in the superior court for writ of mandate on behalf of themselves and “all persons in Alameda County applying for or receiving welfare benefits.” Repondents sought to compel the appellant, Director of the Alameda County Human Resources Agency, to comply immediately with “fair hearing” decisions of the Department of Benefit Payments of the State of California (hereafter DBP).

The matter was heard on September 17, 1974. Judgment was entered on November 12, 1974, granting the peremptory writ,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Ogdon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bowman v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. County of San Diego v. MunizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. People v. StiltnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Westfall v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API