Legal Opinion

Klumb v. Goan

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided July 19, 2012No. 2:09-cv-115PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WILLIAM B. MITCHELL CARTER, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Roy Klumb brought this action alleging defendant Crystal Goan, formerly his wife, violated the federal Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq., and the Tennessee Wiretap Act, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-601 et seq., by installing spyware on his computers without his consent to intercept his incoming email. A bench trial was held and, having heard all the evidence, the Court concludes that defendant Crystal Goan did violate the two wiretap statutes, that the plaintiff is entitled to the statutory damages of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Kenneth R. Smoot v. United Transportation Union Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. Minnick v. California Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Cardinal Health 414, Inc. v. AdamsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008
  5. Argentine v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, ClcCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HutchinsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
  2. United States v. WeindlDistrict Court, Northern Mariana Islands · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API