Legal Opinion

Watts v. Alexander, Morrison & Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 20, 1929No. 4241PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

The defendant Arthur T. Vanderbilt moves for a dismissal of the complaint on various grounds which will be hereinafter considered.'

The action was begun by the plaintiffs, residents of New York, in the Supreme Court of the state of New York, as stockholders of Alexander, Morrison & Co., Inc., a corporation of the state of New Jersey, to compel the defendants to account to the said Alexander, Morrison & Co., Inc., a defendant in the action. On the application of the defendant Arthur. T. Vanderbilt, the action was removed to this court.

It is alleged in the complaint that…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Gaines v. FuentesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dluhos v. Floating & Abandoned Vessel, Known as "New York"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Dluhos v. Floating and Abandoned Vessel, Known as New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. International Bldg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  4. Rector v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  5. United States v. One Oil Painting Entitled "Femme en Blanc" by PicassoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API