Legal Opinion
Murdock v. Stout
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1995No. Nos. 93-56248, 93-56643PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BEEZER; dissent by Judge NOONAN.
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether exigent circumstances justified the warrantless entry and search of a house along with the brief seizure of an occupant by police officers investigating a suspected burglary.
Clyde Murdock, Linda Murdock, and Jeffrey Murdock (collectively “Murdock”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ed Stout, the City of Fonta-na, California, and Fontana Police Officers Mark Jacobson, Dave Walby and Darren Robins (collectively “Fontana”) in Murdock’s 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action alleging a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. Michael JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- John Louis Lalonde v. County of Riverside, Robert Moquin, and Jason Horton, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Donald P. RohrigCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. StruckmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Hector Morales Cervantes, AKA Benito C. CarilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.