Legal Opinion

Hobart Manufacturing Co. v. Kitchen Aid Service, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 21, 1966No. 62 C 739PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DOOLING, District Judge.

Since 1948 plaintiff has manufactured and marketed through established, independently owned regional appliance distributors and local dealers a popular dishwasher indentified as “KitchenAid”. Starting with its use on other articles in 1919, plaintiff has effected a series of registrations of KitchenAid shown always as written without a space between the component words. The registrations for dishwashers on the Principal Register, and the more recent service mark registration on the Principal Register, are in plain type but exhibit modest stylistic…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. Flexitized, Inc., and Flexitized Sales Corporation v. National Flexitized Corporation and Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Triangle Publications, Inc. v. RohrlichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Admiral Corp. v. Penco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Coca-Cola Company v. Gemini Rising, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  3. L.L. Bean, Inc. v. Drake Publishing, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1986
  4. Textron, Inc. v. Spi-Dell Watch & Jewelry Co., Inc. And Ernest MermelsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API