Legal Opinion

Munceas v. Harris

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 3, 1983No. 82-1012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBITT, Judge.

The driver, owner, and insurer of an automobile involved in a rear-end collision appeal a final judgment entered after a jury trial confined to the issue of damages. We agree that the trial court should not have granted a partial summary judgment against these defendants on the issue of liability, and we vacate that order.

The defendant driver crashed into the rear of the plaintiff’s automobile while the latter was stopped at an intersection. The testimony of these two parties during discovery was greatly disparate’ as to the rate of speed at which the defendant’s vehicle was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pensacola Transit Co. v. DentonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Purvis v. Inter-County Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965
  3. Metropolitan Dade County v. EspinosaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tozier v. JarvisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Murray v. SchreinerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API