Danforth v. Sargeant
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
SUFFOLK,
■ This was an action of trespass quare clausum fregit. Issue not guilty. The defendants had hired the premises of the plaintiff for a year, terminating the 13th of April, 1779, and held over until the 20th of May following, notwithstanding being warned out by the plaintiff; and they insisted that they had a right to retain possession until ejected by process of law.
The Court held the defence to be frivolous, and stated that the *420law was clearly otherwise. The lessor, after the term is ended, may enter at pleasure and order the lessees out; and if they hold over, there is no question…
2Cited by5 opinions
- French v. FrenchSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1825
- Sanderson v. PriceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1846
- Adjmi v. Ginter Restaurant Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- President of the Northampton Bank v. WhitingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- Mayo v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1833