Trustees of the Carpenters' Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Darr
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TINDER, Circuit Judge.
A federal court may not enjoin “proceedings in a State court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments.” 28 U.S.C. § 2283. This law, known as Anti-Injunction Act, represents “a necessary concomitant of the Framers’ decision to authorize, and Congress’ decision to implement, a dual system of federal and state courts.” Smith v. Bayer Corp., — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2368, 2375, 180 L.Ed.2d 341 (2011) (quoting Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp., 486 U.S. 140, 146, 108 S.Ct. 1684, 100…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Molina v. Aurora Loan Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Williams v. Milwaukee Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Bond v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Schrempf, Kelly, Napp & Darr, Ltd v. The Carpenters' Health and Welfare Trust FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- BRT Management LLC v. Malden Storage LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.