Rothenhoefer v. City of St. Louis
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Commissioner.
Qaiming a value of $40,000 and $25,000 damages for the destruction of his building known as 1907-1909 St. Louis Avenue, Walter Rothenhoefer instituted this com mon law tort action against the City of St. Louis. A jury was waived, the trial court made an extensive finding of fact, all in favor of the city, and concluded by entering judgment against the plaintiff Rothenhoefer upon his causé of action and upon the city’s counterclaim (the expense of razing plaintiff’s building) entered judgment for the city for $1650 and the plaintiff has appealed.
The action arose in these…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Curtis v. Fruin-Colnon Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Heuer v. John R. Thompson Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Wise v. TowseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Biscoe v. KowalskiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Moll Company v. HolstnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Larabee v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Galemore v. HaleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Galemore v. Mid-West National Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Del Monte Corp. v. Stark & Son Wholesale, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.