Legal Opinion

Ochoa v. Portillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated January 4, 1999, as denied his motion for summary judgment against the defendant Sondra D. Lieberman.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there are triable issues of fact concerning the reasonableness of the conduct of the defendant Sondra D. Lieberman, which preclude the award of summary judgment, in this case (see, Hurley v Izzo, 248 AD2d 674; LaFond v City of New…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hurley v. IzzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. LaFond v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pace v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API