Comyns v. Riker
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county." Action by Catharine Comyns, as executrix, and William Comyns, as executor, of William Comyns," deceased, against William B. Biker, impleaded with others, to set aside a transfer of personal property. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and defendant William B. Biker appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
PEE OUBIAM.
This action was begun June 30, 1892, by a judgment creditor of William H. Riker, to set aside a transfer of personal property by him to William B. Riker as fraudulent and void as against creditors. By the twelfth finding of fact it is found that the appellant, the transferee, was not the creditor of William B. Riker, his son, the transferer, in an amount equal .to the value of the property transferred; and by the thirteenth finding the court found that the transfer was made by William H. Riker to said William B. Riker “with the intent on the part of said William H. Riker to hinder,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- In re WoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Metcalf v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. RikerNew York Supreme Court · 1895