Legal Opinion

Karam v. Wilczek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioners operate a bakery and coffee shop as a nonconforming use in an R-l district. Following a 1988 fire that damaged some of their bakery equipment, petitioners applied for a building permit to alter their structure to accommodate more automated equipment that they intended to install to replace that damaged in the fire. Because the zoning ordinance expressly prohibits the addition to, or enlargement of, a non-conforming use (Village of Yorkville Zoning Ordinance § 29 [1]), respondents denied petitioners’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Village Board v. JarroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Frishman v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. MTR. OFF SHORE REST. CORP. v. LindenNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Cave v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haas Hill Property Owners' Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals of New BaltimoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API