Legal Opinion · Dissent

American Insurance Company v. Foutz and Bursum

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1956No. 5902Published

1DissentKiker, Justice

It is impossible for me to agree that plaintiffs suffered no serious injury on account of the peremptory challenges allowed. I concur in the opinion except as to peremptory challenges.

The opinion of the majority makes the following clear:

Defendants named Southern Union Gas Co. as third party defendant after having answered plaintiffs’ complaint:

Plaintiffs charged that defendants, Foutz and Bursum, a partnership, the individual members-of-which were joined as defendants, were negligent and proximately caused the injury suffered by plaintiffs:

Defendants in the third party complaint charged that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Morris v. CartwrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Mullery v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Mourison v. HansenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  5. Lofland v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API