Legal Opinion

Hittson v. Gentry

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1893No. 135PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Nolan. Tried below before Hon. Wm. Kennedy.

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Chief Justice.

The defendant in error is the administrator de bonis non of the estate of Thomas Barron, deceased. His predecessor in a representative capacity was Katie Barron. As administratrix of the estate of Thomas Barron, she brought this suit against W. W. Bush, J. J. Hittson, and Jack Hittson, to recover the amount alleged to be due on a promissory note charged to have been executed by W. W. Bush, J. J. Hittson, and Jack Hittson ,and payable ‘ ‘to the order of Katie Barron, administratrix estate of Thomas Barron.” The judgment was rendered against these defendants in favor of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Morrison v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liquid Carbonic Co. v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Liquid Carbonic Co. v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API