Legal Opinion

Braman v. Wall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1941No. 32,916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'Stone, Justice.

Two cases consolidated for trial amount to one in replevin for three life insurance policies on the life of plaintiff S. M. Braman, who is the owner, subject to the lien and assignments hereinafter mentioned. The defendant sheriff appeals from the order denying his motion for amended findings or new trial. No one has been served or has appeared to take the seemingly unwanted role of defendant “John Doe.”

It is admitted that the policies are exempt from execution. But long before they got into the hands of defendant sheriff, under a levy made by judgment creditors of Mr. Braman,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. O'DowdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Beigler v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Coit v. WaplesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1854
  4. Smith v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Bennett v. MurtaughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Braman v. WallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Keaney v. McCarthyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API