Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Arbitration between New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance & Bett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 2004Published

1Dissent

Gorski, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully disagree with the position taken by the majority. I conclude that it was error to grant the petition to stay arbitration of this insurance dispute.

In its decision, Supreme Court acknowledged that, on January 3, 2002, respondent, a pedestrian, was struck by an unidentified car driven by an unidentified driver and sustained personal injuries. The court also acknowledged that petitioner issued a motor vehicle liability policy with a supplementary uninsured *1025motorists (SUM) endorsement to respondent that was in effect on January 3, 2002. The court concluded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merchants Mutual Insurance v. FalisiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In re the Arbitration between New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance & GuarinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API