Smith v. Reynolds Metals Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
The Defendant Reynolds Metals Company moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
In this action, Plaintiffs seek to recover damages for an alleged breach of warranty. The salient facts follow.
On August 24, 1965, Plaintiffs entered into a contract with Guard-All Aluminum Products for the installation of a roof on Plaintiffs’ house. The shingles used on the job were known as “Shingle-Shakes” and were manufactured by Merit Aluminum Products from aluminum supDlied by Defendant Reynolds Metals Company. Following…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- National Surety Corp. v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ebasco Services Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Patton v. Conrad Area School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975