Legal Opinion

Smith v. Reynolds Metals Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 69-88PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MUIR, District Judge.

The Defendant Reynolds Metals Company moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

In this action, Plaintiffs seek to recover damages for an alleged breach of warranty. The salient facts follow.

On August 24, 1965, Plaintiffs entered into a contract with Guard-All Aluminum Products for the installation of a roof on Plaintiffs’ house. The shingles used on the job were known as “Shingle-Shakes” and were manufactured by Merit Aluminum Products from aluminum supDlied by Defendant Reynolds Metals Company. Following…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Surety Corp. v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ebasco Services Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Patton v. Conrad Area School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API