Legal Opinion

Johnson & Johnson v. Kaufman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1997No. A96A2468PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Gary Kaufman, individually and as executor of the estate of Amy Kaufman, his deceased wife, sued Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”) and Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. (“Janssen”), alleging that his wife died as the result of taking the drug Hismanal, an antihistamine prescribed to her for allergies. Janssen, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of J&J, manufactures, markets and distributes Hismanal in the United States. Hismanal is also manufactured and distributed internationally through numerous other J&J subsidiaries. Kaufman contends that at the time of his wife’s death, the defendants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Waldrip v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Eidson v. CroutchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  3. In Re PaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. HICKEY Et Al. v. RREF BB SBL ACQUISITIONS, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  5. BUCKNER-WEBB v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API