Nihoa v. Chow

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON, C.J.

This is an action to quiet title at law, pursuant to HRS §§ 669-1 et seq. (1975 Supp.). Both plaintiff and defendants assert fee ownership of the disputed parcel, which lies between the beach and plaintiff’s undisputed property. Plaintiff alleges adverse possession by herself and/or her predecessors in interest. Defendants claim title based on a deed. The trial court found for the defendants.

This court affirms the judgment of the trial court. There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the conclusions by the trial court (1) that the defendants…