Legal Opinion

Ritter v. Miami Marine Agency, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 1961No. 61-116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Judge.

The appellant seeks review of a final judgment determining damages resulting from an alleged wrongful attachment. This order arose out of the following situation : Subsequent to the release of a writ of attachment in the original action, wherein the writ had been issued against a vessel, a third party claiming right of possession to the vessel, Miami Marine Agency, Inc., filed a petition to assess damages against the plaintiff (appellant herein), for alleged wrongful attachment and attorney’s fees incurred in causing the discharge of the writ. Thereafter, without further…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Florio v. State Ex Rel. EppersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Pittman v. RobertsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Steen v. Ross, Keen & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1886
  4. Bondy v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
  5. Engelke & Feiner Milling Co. v. GrunthalSupreme Court of Florida · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ware v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Harvey v. FischerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API