Legal Opinion

Russell Lee Hinman v. D. J. McCarthy Superintendent

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1982No. 81-5051PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

McCarthy (the State) appeals from an order of the district court granting a writ of habeas corpus to Hinman pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The State makes three different challenges to the granting of this collateral relief. First, the State contends that 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), which authorizes federal magistrates to conduct evidentiary hearings in habeas proceedings and make recommendations to the district court, constitutes an unconstitutional delegation under Article III and violates principles of comity and federalism. Second, the State argues that Hinman should…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Jerome M. Armant v. Joe MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. William R. Cody v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary Mark Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. John R. McCown v. William CallahanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. People v. DuranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. United States v. Bernard G. Decoito and Francisco Tagalicod, Jr., United States of America v. Bernard G. DecoitoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API