Crewe Tractor & Equipment Co. v. Deutz Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
WARRINER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendant Deutz’s ripe motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer this action to a district and division where it might have been brought as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). For the reasons set forth below it is hereby ORDERED that this cause of action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division.
Defendant Deutz Corporation, a distributor of agricultural equipment, is a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Robert L. Bense v. Interstate Battery System of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Midwest Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Tampa Constructors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1987
- Benge v. Software Galeria, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
- Ilan v. Andrew F. Troia, Esq.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024