Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Lasby

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1932No. 6,848Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

2Opinion of the CourtJustice Ford

On petition for rehearing counsel for defendants contend that questions decisive of the case were overlooked by the court and they undertake to point out that the record with the original order considered does not affirmatively show that there was due compliance with the statutory requirements relating to the appointment of a receiver. The contention is predicated upon the fact that the register of actions does not show any application for the appointment of a receiver, or that notice of the hearing was filed as required by statute. From this it is argued that no…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cohn v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Benepe-Owenhouse Co. v. ScheideggerMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Starr v. Bankers Union of WorldNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Forrester & MacGinniss v. Boston & Montana Consol. Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Wright v. FlynnMontana Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API