Legal Opinion

Root v. Ball

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio

Decided July 15, 1846PublishedCited by 6 opinions

[This was an action by David Root against Ball & Davis.]

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This is an action for an infringement of a patent. The plaintiff declares against the defendants for violating a patent right granted for a design of ornamental parts of a stove, dated 9th of September. 1845. with the ordinary breaches.

The defendants pleaded: (1) The general issue. (2) Because before the date of the patent on the 0th of January, 1S44, “stoves constructed upon the plan of the stove patented by plaintiff, with the same general design and combination of the ornamental parts, were publicly made and sold by the defendants at the district, etc. (3) Because…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sewall v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Ripley v. Elson Glass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1892
  3. Sessions v. RomadkaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1884
  4. Williams v. Syracuse & S. R. Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1908
  5. Anderson v. EilerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API