Legal Opinion

ASC Contractors v. Harr

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 1984No. 82-03306; CA A30063PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

ASC Contractors, the employer in this workers’ compensation case, seeks reversal of an order on review of the Workers’ Compensation Board, which found claimant’s claim for carpal tunnel syndrome to be compensable. We affirm.1

The employer denied responsibility, because it asserted that claimant had experienced symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome before he began to work for employer. Claimant admits to having suffered intermittent numbness in the first three fingers of each of his hands. He states that he experienced those symptoms for four years before he started working for employer and that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hutcheson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wheeler v. Boise CascadeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chatfield v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API