Legal Opinion

Hyman v. Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It is settled by tbe decision in Smith ex parte, 134 N. C., 495, 47 S. E., 16, tbat tbe issuing of an execution on a decree charging owelty in partition is barred by tbe ten-year statute of limitations. See, also, Newsome v. Harrell, 168 N. C., 295, 84 S. E., 337, and Cochran v. Colson, 192 N. C., 663, 135 S. E., 794.

It is likewise settled by a number of decisions, notably Lytle v. Lytle, 94 N. C., 683, Lyon v. Russ, 84 N. C., 588, and Pasour v. Rhyne, 82 N. C., 149, tbat tbe lien upon lands of a docketed judgment is lost by tbe lapse of ten years from tbe date of tbe docketing, and this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lytle v. . LytleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Pasour v. . RhyneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  3. Lyon v. . RussSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Newsome v. . HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Cochran v. . ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCullen v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. McCullen v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Lupton v. . EdmundsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Cheshire v. . DrakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Great Western Exchange, Inc. v. WaltersColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API