Legal Opinion

State v. Lang

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 23, 1997No. 95-477PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Travis Lang appeals his conviction for first-degree murder, claiming that his taped, *573pre-information statements to an informant were admitted at trial in violation of the Sixth Amendment, the Vermont public defender statutes, and Disciplinary Rule 7-104(A)(l) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Without these statements, defendant argues, the evidence was insufficient to convict him. We hold that the trial court properly admitted the taped statements, and affirm.

Although the murder occurred in 1988, information connecting defendant to the incident surfaced much later. In…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Eid Hammad, A/K/A Eddie Hammad, and Taiseer HammadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Donald Eugene Ryans D/B/A Ryans Moving & Storage and Westside MoversCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BarronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API