Legal Opinion

Dempster Mill Manufacturing Co. v. Fitzwater

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 16, 1897No. 210PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Nemaha District Court. Hon. J. F. Thompson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMahan, P. J.

It is difficult in this case to determine of what action or actions of the court the plaintiff in error complains. It is an action brought in the court below by the plaintiff in error to recover the price of certain machinery which it claims to have sold to the defendants upon a written contract set out in its petition, and for the time and expense of an expert furnished under another written contract set out in the petition. The first writing is, in substance and effect, an order by one of the defendants in behalf of all for a well-boring machine. There is appended to this a guaranty. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dodge v. OatisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Lyon v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Wilson v. Avery Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Johnson v. Ben Olson CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API