Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Nunamaker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1924No. Appeal, 6PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

On full consideration of the record in this case we are obliged to sustain the eighth and eleventh assignments of error. We might pass over either of them, if it stood alone, on the principle that it could not have misled the jury, (Com. v. Daily, 280 Pa. 59), but taken together, we are not satisfied that the jury were not confused by the court’s charge. After, instructing the jury substantially correctly on the subject of reasonable doubt, the trial judge went on to say: “Preponderance of evidence does not necessarily mean the greater number of witnesses, but it means…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MentzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Commonwealth v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Commonwealth v. ZeitlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Commonwealth v. Sonis SonisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AikensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Summit Hill Rod & Gun Club Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Fumea Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Commonwealth v. NorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Commonwealth v. GrillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API