Commonwealth v. Nunamaker
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
On full consideration of the record in this case we are obliged to sustain the eighth and eleventh assignments of error. We might pass over either of them, if it stood alone, on the principle that it could not have misled the jury, (Com. v. Daily, 280 Pa. 59), but taken together, we are not satisfied that the jury were not confused by the court’s charge. After, instructing the jury substantially correctly on the subject of reasonable doubt, the trial judge went on to say: “Preponderance of evidence does not necessarily mean the greater number of witnesses, but it means…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MentzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Commonwealth v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Commonwealth v. ZeitlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Commonwealth v. Sonis SonisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AikensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Summit Hill Rod & Gun Club Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Fumea Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Commonwealth v. NorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Commonwealth v. GrillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928