Commonwealth v. Pirela
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This appeal is from the judgment of sentence for second degree murder, robbery, and criminal conspiracy. Appellant contends that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) there was insufficient evidence to convict him; and (3) the trial court erred in denying a motion for a mistrial after the prosecutor told a witness he would be jailed if he failed to testify. 1 For the following reasons, we affirm.
On July 6, 1983, appellant was arrested and charged in connection with the August 15, 1982 shooting of Ignacio Slafman during the robbery of a pizzeria. After a bench trial with a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ZugaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. ZeweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.