Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pirela

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1990No. 169PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from the judgment of sentence for second degree murder, robbery, and criminal conspiracy. Appellant contends that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) there was insufficient evidence to convict him; and (3) the trial court erred in denying a motion for a mistrial after the prosecutor told a witness he would be jailed if he failed to testify. 1 For the following reasons, we affirm.

On July 6, 1983, appellant was arrested and charged in connection with the August 15, 1982 shooting of Ignacio Slafman during the robbery of a pizzeria. After a bench trial with a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. In Re MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZugaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. RussellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. ZeweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API