Dean v. Nichols & Shepard Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Monona District Court. — Hon. George W. Wakefield, Judge. Action to recover three thousand five hundred '•dollars damages for the alleged wrongful conversion •of four promissory notes aggregating one thousand four hundred and ten dollars. Verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for two thousand two hundred and ninety-eight dollars and forty cents. Defendant appeals. The issues and facts are sufficiently set forth ¡in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGiven, C. J.
*921 *932 *90I. The errors assigned and argued in the instructions. The following is a sufficient in the instructions. The following is a sufficient statement of the issues and facts for an understanding of the questions discussed: Under date of July 5, 1889, the plaintiff purchased from defendant, through its agent, Will G. Whiting & Go., at Whiting, Iowa, one steam-threshing outfit, with certain specified appliances, upon terms and conditions expressed in a written order signed by plaintiff and his father, Silas Dean. Plaintiff. agreed to receive the machine on arrival, “subject to all the conditions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Decker v. . MathewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Thayer v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Farnham v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Ingalls v. LordNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- Latham v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- First National Bank v. DutcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Iowa National Bank v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Peninsular Bank v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Leonard v. SehmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Hale v. Van Buren, Heck & Marvin Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.