Legal Opinion
Zink v. Heiser
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Hyman, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover moneys allegedly due to him based upon an employer’s separate pension plan and profit-sharing plan made by it for the benefit of its employees (hereinafter participants). Both plans were noncontributing as to such participants.
The nature of the single action is that there are specific moneys due to the plaintiff on both plans; but, that, result*355ing from certain alleged activities of both plans, the trustees are charged with.dissipation, waste, diversion, negligence in the performance of their duties, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Husted v. . ThomsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Alt v. Long Island RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Silfen v. United Whelan Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982