Legal Opinion

Foster, Son & Harlan v. Whitten

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1917No. 7998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint—appeal; from Whitfield, superior court—Judge Fite. November 27, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.

1. A suit upon a promissory note under seal, dated February 9, 1891, and due one day after date, was commenced July 30, 1915. The plaintiff alleged, that “while the note, the foundation of the suit, shows on its face to be barred by the statute of limitations, it in fact is not barred; that for a number of years following the signing of the note defendant resided out of the State of Georgia; that for twelve or thirteen years since said note was signed defendant has been incarcerated in the Georgia Penitentiary, being legally dead, and for the remainder of the time has been beyond the limits…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heard v. CaldwellDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1973
  2. Hardin v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Maddox v. Hall CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API