Legal Opinion

State v. Candebat

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 2014No. 2013-KA-0780PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES F. McKAY III, Chief Judge.

hThe defendant appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to suppress the evidence. After a review of the record before us, we find that the trial court erred in denying Brad Candebat’s motion to suppress the evidence. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s judgment, grant the defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence, and vacate his guilty plea and sentence.

STATEMENT OF CASE

The State filed a bill of information charging the defendant, Brad Candebat, with possession of a controlled dangerous substance, amphetamine, a violation of La. R.S.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. FieldsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. State v. BaughLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. State v. DimesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. State of Louisiana v. Arial Valencia-LacayoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. State of Louisiana v. Arial Valencia-LacayoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API