Legal Opinion

Matter of Ament

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1994No. 94-0456PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we must decide whether, in the context of compulsory discipline, the Board of Disciplinary Appeals may suspend an attorney for a period of time which exceeds the probationary period received by that attorney in a criminal proceeding. Because we find that the Board of Disciplinary Appeals has exceeded the power delegated to it under the Rules of Disciplinary Procedure, we modify the suspension of the Board of Disciplinary Appeals.

In May 1988, John S. Ament executed a promissory note payable to the Texas National Bank of Jacksonville. Ament received a cashier’s check from the Bank…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. McGregor v. ClawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Sanchez v. Board of Disciplinary AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Travis County v. Pelzel & Associates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re CaballeroTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. McLendon v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  4. Abbott v. G.G.ECourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Ex parte SpringsteenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API