Legal Opinion

Eady v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 3, 1969No. 3 Div. 408PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of robbery. His punishment was fixed at fifty years in the state penitentiary. Fie has appealed to this court from the judgment of conviction, contending error in the following areas:

1. That the judgment of conviction must be reversed under authority of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776, since those jurors professing general objection of capital punishment were excluded. In this contention appellant is wrong. The holding in Witherspoon is not applicable where the jury recommends a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Gassenheimer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Parsons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Neelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Moore v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  5. Bracewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API