Legal Opinion
The New York Marine No. 10
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 13, 1940No. 233PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
This litigation is the outgrowth of a collision on the Barge Canal near Tonawanda, N. Y., on September 11, 1937, between a barge in the tow of the tug New York Marine No. 10 and a barge in the tow of the tug C. F. Coughlin. The district judge in an admirably clear opinion found the tug No. 10 solely at fault. We are asked by one appellant, McNall, to charge both tugs with fault. The other appellants, owner and charterer of No. 10, assert that the sole fault lies with the Coughlin. These contentions raise only questions of fact which the district judge resolved in favor of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- The Albert DumoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Lie v. San Francisco & Portland Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- The 84-HCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co. v. LawtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby WearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Carr v. Hermosa Amusement Corporation, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Tug Ocean Prince, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Henry Du Bois Sons Co. v. A/S Ivarans RederiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.