Legal Opinion

Miller v. Cole

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 1, 2008No. A08A0185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, plaintiffs Connie and Gary Miller appeal the judgment in favor of defendants Harvey Cole, M.D., and Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C., on their malpractice claim, arguing that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion in limine to exclude expert testimony that Dr. Cole breached the standard of care in performing two prior surgeries on Connie Miller, which occurred three years before the surgery at issue and as to which any claims were time-barred. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Viewed in support of the jury’s verdict,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kicklighter v. KicklighterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Monroe v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Redfearn v. Huntcliff Homes Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Robinson v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Wagner v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ahmed v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Dagne v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  3. Sellers v. BurrowesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API