Malcolm Cameron v. State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MAXWELL, J., for the Court:
¶ 1. The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, including unreasonable traffic stops. But if an officer had probable cause to believe a traffic violation occurred, the traffic stop is reasonable. Here, Malcolm Cameron never raised a Fourth Amendment challenge to the stop. Still, the record shows the officer pulled over Cameron after watching him swerve in his vehicle. So Cameron’s non-asserted argument that the exclusionary rule should bar evidence obtained following the stop fails.
¶2. We also find Cameron’s argument that there was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bush v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Carr v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
- Marshall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Carl Richard Cook v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stephen Nolan v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
- Lynda Dianne Robinette v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
- Antionne Sellers a/k/a Antionne Jeremiah Sellers v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021
- Charles Webber v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
- Charles Webber v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.