Legal Opinion

Malcolm Cameron v. State of Mississippi

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided September 29, 2015No. 2014-KM-01802-COAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, J., for the Court:

¶ 1. The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, including unreasonable traffic stops. But if an officer had probable cause to believe a traffic violation occurred, the traffic stop is reasonable. Here, Malcolm Cameron never raised a Fourth Amendment challenge to the stop. Still, the record shows the officer pulled over Cameron after watching him swerve in his vehicle. So Cameron’s non-asserted argument that the exclusionary rule should bar evidence obtained following the stop fails.

¶2. We also find Cameron’s argument that there was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bush v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Carr v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Marshall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Carl Richard Cook v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Mosley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stephen Nolan v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  2. Lynda Dianne Robinette v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  3. Antionne Sellers a/k/a Antionne Jeremiah Sellers v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2021
  4. Charles Webber v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  5. Charles Webber v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API