Legal Opinion
Barcia v. Sitkin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 10, 2004No. 03-7715PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge.
The principal questions we consider are whether, in the circumstances presented, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Robert L. Carter, Judge) erred in (1) denying an application to modify a consent decree entered into in 1983, and (2) granting three requests for enforcement of the decree and for further relief. The consent decree was the result of consolidated class actions challenging the practices and procedures of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, a body established by the State of New York to determine eligibility…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barcia v. SitkinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- The Western Mohegan Tribe And Nation v. Orange CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CioffiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Jackson v. Los Lunas CenterDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.