Legal Opinion
Village of Boonville v. Maltbie
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.
“ Must the Public Service Commission in fixing just and reasonable rates for a municipal lighting plant fix rates high enough not only to yield a revenue sufficient to pay all operating expenses, including necessary depreciation charges, but in addition a return on the value of the property owned by the village and used in providing the electric service?” Thus the learned counsel for the respondents correctly states the question here involved. *470The issue arises out of two complaints made to the Public Service Commission that the rates charged by the village of Boonville for electric service…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Wagner v. City of Rock IslandIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Municipal Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Village of Boonville v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Koch v. DysonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Danna v. Con Edison Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1972
- Village of Boonville v. MaltbieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936