Legal Opinion
Trafficschool. Com, Inc. v. Edriver, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 4, 2008No. CV 06-7561 PA (CWx)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FINDING DEFENDANTS LIABLE FOR FALSE ADVERTISING
PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.
A court trial was held on November 6-8, 2007. On November 28, 2007, Plaintiffs and Defendants each filed their Post-Trial Briefs, and on January 24, 2008, Plaintiffs and Defendants each filed their final responses to the opposing parties’ proposed Post-Trial Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. After considering the evidence, briefs, and arguments of counsel, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. 1
I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Bayer Corp. Combination Aspirin Products Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Peviani v. Hostess Brands, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Two Jinn, Inc. v. Government Payment Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Pom Wonderful LLC v. Welch Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Campagnolo S.R.L. v. Full Speed Ahead, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.