Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Scammon
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE CIROUIT COTTRT OP THE UNITED STÁTES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. This was a bill in equity to foreclose a mortgage. The case ■is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Justice .Blatchfoed
delivered the opinion of the court.
On the 10th of September, 1866, J. Young Scammon, of Chicago, Illinois, and Florence A. D. Scammon and Arianna E. Scammon, his daughters, were the owners, of a lot of lfind in Chicago, No. 90 Michigan Avenue, known as “ lot number five (5), in block number eleven (11), in Fort Dearborn Addition to Chicago,” the father being the oAvner in fee of an equal undivided one third part of the lot, and having a tenancy for life ,in the other equal undivided two third parts; and his two daughters’ being each the owner in fee of an equal…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Helson & Randolph v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Haskin v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Godfrey State Bank v. MundyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Malvaney v. YagerMontana Supreme Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.