Legal Opinion

Kerrigan v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1902No. Nos. 13,025-(110)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Winona county, Snow, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the- verdict or for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff had a verdict in the court below for $8,475, and defendant appeals from *408an order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial.

Plaintiff was a fireman in defendant’s employ for ten years prior to the time of receiving the injuries complained of, and for the three years immediately preceding it worked on engine No. 190, with McLindon as engineer; his run being between La Crosse, Wisconsin, and Austin, Minnesota, a distance of about…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bucher v. Cheshire RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Phelps v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Green v. Brainerd & Northern Minnesota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Gabrielson v. WaydellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1895
  5. Whereatt v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Major v. OwenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Carroll v. WillistonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Wexler v. SalisburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Hedin v. Northwestern Knitting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API