Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Smith

District Court, D. Kentucky

Decided February 9, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Bankruptcy. Petition in involuntary bankruptcy by Goldman, Beckman & Go. and other creditors against Newton M. Smith, with petition by A. G. Pranks, an alleged preferred creditor, for leave to intervene and be made a defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

BARB, District Judge.

Goldman, Beckman & Co., and other creditors of Newton M. Smith, filed a petition to declare the defendant, Newton M. Smith, an involuntary bankrupt. The grounds set out in the petition are that Smith, being tbe owner of a stock of goods of the value of about $3,000, transferred and conveyed the same to his brother-in-law, A. G. Pranks, with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud his creditors; and, second, that Smith, being insolvent, transferred said stock of goods and merchandise, which were located in Ms store, in Grant county, to said A. C. Pranks, upon the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Banks v. ManchesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Brown v. Scottish-American Mortgage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Barry v. AbbotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Walker v. JackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  5. Stone v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. NovotnySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Raley v. Raymond Bros. Clarke Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Wilson v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Brinkley v. SmithwickDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API