Legal Opinion
Durst v. Grant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 23, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
*1196Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking, among other things, control of Bethel’s property and enjoining defendants from purporting to be the trustees of Bethel. Defendants answered and counterclaimed for various relief, including enjoining plaintiffs from controlling the property of Bethel. Eventually, the parties stipulated to waive a trial and have Supreme Court decide the case based on certain agreed facts as well as submitted papers. The stipulated facts included that Bethel was a District affiliated church. Supreme Court nevertheless held in its decision that Bethel was a General…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kedroff v. Saint Nicholas Cathedral of the Russian Orthodox Church in North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Mitchell v. New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- First Presbyterian Church v. United Presbyterian Church in United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaczor v. KaczorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Lantigua v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Halstead v. FourniaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Kaczor v. KaczorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012