Legal Opinion

Wells v. . Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

"We do not think that any of the exceptions to the judgment by defendants, appellants, can be sustained.

The contention of appellants' is that Laura A. Williams only devised to her husband, J. B. Williams, a life estate in the land and the defendants, appellants, have a remainder in fee simple, share and share alike. That the subsequent provision in the will authorizing the executor to sell and convey the lands could not deprive the appellants, the re-maindermen, of their estate in fee simple. That the necessity for making the sale under the will is with the court and not the executor.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chewning v. . MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Parks v. Robinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Smith v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Troy v. . TroySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864
  5. Stroud v. . MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1860

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Brown v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Toms v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API